History

For those that don't know about history...... here is a condensed version.

Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.

The two most important events in all of history were:

1. The invention of beer, and

2. The invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer.

These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:

1. Liberals

2. Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.

Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.

Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girlie-men.

Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.

Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.

Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels t han their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.

Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America . They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Here ends today's lesson in world history.......

This is a stolen article******I would give credits, but the guy I stole it from stole it from another.......I have no idea who the original author was......It is very good though.

Impeachment

Impeachment

I'm not sure I believe the election process is real, I suspect its rigged. But, assuming one were to entertain the notion that the acting president and other elected officials were truly elected as they claim, then WTF, are they doing?


They have thrown money at everything with a hand out and a current yacht club membership, The cash for clunkers was a bust, for every 4k incentive to buyers it cost an additional 20k in administration costs, Further evidence the government cant even run a give-away program efficiently, The total costs per vehicle was 24,500.00. This is insane! Southern Ca is claiming a rise in home values for the last year, its not much, but sales rose something like 20k per sale, above sales from '08. They are crediting the government home buyer program for the increase. Well woopty fucking do! If they offered a credit of 8k per house it will likely costs 5 times that in administration expenses, So again the tax payers can pay 50k per house sale to allow a sucker to go in hawk to the bank for an inflated mortgage at a still bloated housing market, I'm sure there will be  another bailout to absorb the defaults when the participants of this program default. Besides more than half of the current foreclosures have yet to hit the market.the foreclosures are active  but the hammer has yet to fall. The banks have several reasons to stall the defaults, but there are so many houses with mortgages over a year delinquent, The housing is not going to improve, the banks reluctance is still another scam to prop a market by false information. In addition to the ones waiting on the final action of foreclosure,We are starting a whole new round of foreclosures in addition to the others, there are more people loosing there jobs, and their houses will follow the  tide.


It is interesting to note the only "programs" that had a hint of improving the economy although to expensive because of government dead weight administration, were the housing buyer program and cash for clunkers, even though the later was engineered to benefit the democratic supporting unions, A pay back for the election. The difference with these programs were the beneficiary. The bailouts that had no positive impact on the economy, the money was paid to the Ellette high-rollers, The money is lost to wonderland. In contrary the programs that put money in to the working class did hit the economy, and did provide short term gain. Obviously these housing and auto programs are failures of epic proportions and asinine in logic of common sense, and costs more than ever was or will be gained; the point remains to get money in the working class give it to the working class.


Now, we know programs are more expensive to administer, than could ever be gained. If they were stupid enough to think otherwise, the latest programs offer a good example to those that didn't know. I have known for years the solution to this problem is in tax relief for the working class. The beauty is no expensive programs to take from others and spread it around, but rather not taking the money in first-place, would have marvelous improvement. I suspect our turmoil would end in a year if income tax was reduced by 75%.


The thing is all these programs were not intended to improve the economy, I can only speculate the deceptive purposes. With this in mind the programs are probably a success in doing what was intended. They were not intended to improve the economy, the tools and resources have been present to correct our economic peril. One would need to be stupid to believe the intent of any bailout or program was intended to improve our economy. Perhaps they are that dumb, maybe they think government money is a never-ending source of wealth. California has believed for years the solution to problems was to increase the tax and subsidized the pore, all the while skimming more money from taxes collected to support the ever growing agency to manage programs, then creating yet more programs to equalize the impoverished that they created by overtaxing in the first place............They are in financial ruin, and still dont get it, they are slating several other tax increases. unfortunately the socialistic ideas favored by CA, are working there way to the other states of the nation. It doesn't take a genius to realize the same concept will bring the same problems.


CA is only still barely afloat today, because of the resources they are taping from the rest of the nation. Now when the US adopts the same practice of CA on a national scale, and the same financial problems that plague them will will plague the US as a hole, there will be no life raft.


Now look at us, we have several wars to deplete our resources, We are on a verge of the next Great Depression. The dollar is sinking lower with the passing of every day, The inflation is climbing faster than the dollar is falling, Have you seen the price of food lately. Speaking of food our production has hit a record low, The big problem with this is food export is basically the only export we do. World trade is the key to a strong dollar, If the dollar continues to stumble OPEC will be forced to use a different currency. this will happen anyways but the sinking dollar will certainly expedite this. No-one wants to trade oil in a Zimbabwe type of currency. If the dollar is dumped for national currency, its the end of all dollar based assets including the US holdings. Bonds are just paper with numbers. Cash will go the way of confederate currency, its still in your hand, but the country promising its value is not intact to redeem its value. US bankruptcy, negates currency. We have the largest debt in the WORLD.



Our president has spent the first half of his first year in office campaigning to explain what a good job he is going to do. The second half of the first year has been absorbed in health care, knowing we cant afford the programs we already have. Now, with the election of Senator Brown Obama's baby is likely going the way of the titanic. good riddens. But, a year wasted in this country's most turmoils of times. I dont like the guy but still, in all fairness, he is a complete failure. Nothing he has done, has been any benefit. Not one of his programs were even marginally successful, All stimulus has been a black hole. If a man with this performance worked for your company would you keep him another year?Or another 3 years to see if he is capable of bringing your company from bankruptcy, and if he cant your company will be destroyed beyond repair. I think we need to ponder risk to reward. Look at it this way; If Obama were a stock, would you by-it? I think I would be looking for a stock with better stability in the past, and more promise for the future.........But, that's just my money. Better stock and Presidents are available.


I think people are going to need to look at the realistic need for Impeachment.

Talking SHIT

Have you noticed the parties these days that support Socialism have this trick of referring to non supporters who speak out against the agenda of socialism, by saying they were talking "RHETORIC". They say it with a sneer or whine in their voice suggesting rhetoric is synonymous with "talking shit".

Watch for this, when watching the news, Obama and Co. uses this trick to discredit another that is not supporting their agenda...........A wise person knows the definition ; therefore knows they have unwittingly given praise and credibility to the same person whom they sought to discredit.

Remember the definition outlined below the next time you hear the socialites say "he was talking Rhetoric" to discount the facts outlined by one of their foes.


rhet·o·ric

(rět'ər-ĭk)    n.  The art or study of using language effectively and persuasively. A treatise or book discussing this art. A style of speaking or writing, especially the language of a particular subject: fiery political rhetoric. Language that is elaborate, pretentious, insincere, or intellectually vacuous: His offers of compromise were mere rhetoric. Skill in using language effectively and persuasively. A style of speaking or writing, especially the language of a particular subject: fiery political rhetoric. Language that is elaborate, pretentious, insincere, or intellectually vacuous: His offers of compromise were mere rhetoric. Verbal communication; discourse. [Middle English rethorik, from Old French rethorique, from Latin rhētoricē, rhētorica, from Greek rhētorikē (tekhnē), rhetorical (art), feminine of rhētorikos, rhetorical, from rhētōr, rhetor; see rhetor.]

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Cite This Source

Word Origin & History

rhetoric 

c.1300, from O.Fr. rethorique, from L. rhetorice, from Gk. rhetorike techne "art of an orator," from rhetor (gen. rhetoros) "orator," related to rhema "word," lit. "that which is spoken," from PIE *wre-tor-, from base *were- "to speak" (cf. O.E. word, L. verbum, Gk. eirein "to say;" see verb). Rhetorical "eloquent" is from 1476; rhetorical question first attested 1843.

Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper
Cite This Source

Pick a corner........Hey,,,, you can poke an eye out with that !!!!!!!

No one is talking about this Health Care Thing, why not! The thing is we will be so screwed if this thing goes in-to law. They haven't even made this package available to view. In the last plan your average Joe, making under 50k a year would have to pay 1600.00 per year. If you dont pay you will be fined, if you still fail to pay, criminal action will follow!

The 1600.00 per year is 135.00 per month per person. The wife and I will have to pay 330.00 per month. How much will they charge for kids? It seems safe to presume each child will costs the 135. per month. Family of four is then 660 per month. If your household income is over 50k bend over further! It will be much higher.

Oh I know, the government wouldn't do that. They know we cant afford 660 per month. Bull shit! A standard child support judgment in many states is half of your net. Primarily this is if the other parent is on welfare (the money is paid to the state.) Tell them you cant afford that, you still have options, pay or go to jail. Point is If they can take half your income for a child, then divert the payments to support the state Child Support Services, overhead........ They will have no problem taking 660 from you to support there program. YOU WILL PAY! or you will be criminalized.

Look, In the fall of '08, I didn't know if in a years time civilization would be civil, we were on a tight rope it could have gone ether way, any day. SHTF, was on the verge of realty. Fuel prices were robbing most of any reserve cash, people were getting pushed in a corner. Tensions have eased but , we are still in a corner......When government takes the last of your future, there taking your destiny by insuring your poverty for the rest of your life.  I have been in a corner poked with the big stick of government. At least I will no longer be alone. Welcome to my world.

This is how this will go down, you cant pay this, I cant ether. Lets say its just you and a child. Two things first off, If you dont cover your child this will be 'child neglect or abuse' this carries a fine and jail time all on its own. Also this Health Care program has a projected costs, The actual costs are always higher than projected, Medicare was 10 times higher than projected, in the first ten years of its origination. They just charge you more to cover the difference. Back to the costs for you and another.

First year your debt is 3200.00
penalty 10%                  320.00
interest 10%                  352.00
total                           3872.00

Next year if your not in jail, and I hope you still have a drivers license.

debt is                         7072.00
penalty                           772.00
interest                            784.00
total                            8628.00

after 5 yrs
  total + int/pen 35168.00   Now they have their control, you would have to pay over 6k every year. just to keep the balance from increasing. Since you have an arrears of 35k you will have to pay the 3872.00 every year and pay your interest and penalty    on the 35k If you pay 6k a year, now it will take you 40 YEARS to pay your acount current. You will be a slave for the rest of your life. (how do you like your change now?)


I dont think people realize when this goes through every person will have a judgment against them, for payment. When they have a "judgment", Your freedom is over they can do anything they want to collect from you, and THEY WILL!

GET IN  YOUR CORNER SLAVE! no dont poke me with that stick, your gona poke my eye out!

Found this on cragslist................ I'm sure you will agree..............

RR RON REAGEN ROLLS ROYCE OF PRESIDENTS (If ya cant make em see the light, make em feel the heat!)

---

Here's my strategy on the Cold War: We win, they lose."

"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

"Of the four wars in my lifetime none came about because the U.S. was too strong."

"I have wondered at times about what the Ten Commandment's would have looked like if Moses had run them through the U.S. Congress."

"The taxpayer: That's someone who works for the federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service examination."

"Government is like a baby: An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other."

"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under."

"The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program."

"I've laid down the law, though, to everyone from now on about anything that happens: no matter what time it is, wake me, even if it's in the middle of a Cabinet meeting."

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first."

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."

"Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself you can always write a book."

"No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.

- Ronald Reagan

I'm sure you will agree..............

I heard this on the radio the other day; I was listening to a conservative talk show. (I some times listen to the liberals show for a laugh.) This guy called in and said: "I'm sure you will agree....." The host stopped him and pointed out that his statement is some thing like a Yale debate team tactic. ( I've never been to Yale, so I dont know; they're probably closet homos anyway). To say "I'm sure you will agree" is a way to present a supposition to the listener(s) that;whom your speaking to agrees, with out him saying a word, there by gaining a point or an edge. You can use this to lead into two points in one statement. of course, an obvious statement in retort is " well, no I dont agree at all......" . But, still in doing this they have to divide your points, and address each individually by there own flaws (as-it were).

I have tried to debate with liberals its hard to do,even when your right;your still wrong. Slamming your dick in the door is more rewarding.

I have often wondered if learning debate tactics would aid in the cause of winning our country back. Suppose your at a table with some liberals, when politics come up (you know it will)If you were able to debate convincingly, You dont need to win; per se, If you are able to get there minds looking in the right direction.To see the big picture. even if people can be made to see only one truth at a time then over time, truths fall in place. The big picture of things seems to be a unanimous flaw in liberals; there thought is usually limited to what government will give them for free, they are oblivious to the fact that our government makes no money. Any money they have given, away they stole from another. I have known several liberals and mostly they seem to believe what ever they are told by there heroes, they dont seem to wonder why or how; like : Do we need another government program, and how is the money gotten to pay for it.

I have some family members and acquaintances that are very liberal, I have found them to be of poor moral fiber, Greedy, dishonest, and stupid or naive.

I'm sure you will agree,

Happy Trails!

Error of the socialist

Socialist, Is an error of thinking. There concept fails in simple logic. Rush summed it up by saying:
"To get paid more than you produce is not sustainable." end quote.

I have been self employed most of my life. I know his statement to be true. In other words Rush is right!