Tuesday, January 12, 2010

EXECUTIVE ORDER

 Updated to add this link: http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-executive-order-stokes-martial-law-fears.html


EXECUTIVE ORDER
I just caught a news blurb. Apparently Obama signed an Executive Order.......??????
The talk of a Civilian National Security Force is back................
Has this been enacted now, by funds re-appropriation.........????????.

In reality, if Obama signs an executive order making his security force law this bypasses the Senate and the House. An Executive Order goes in to affect at his discretion. However without the Senate there could be no funds appropriated for this legally. But with all the money flowing through Washington, I don't think it would it be difficult for Obama and Co. to redirect funds to their new security force, if desired.


Our group of government socialist are using old school Nazi tactics to secure control of the country and populace. 

Are we going to tolerate a Gestapo?




Ge·sta·po
  (gə-stä'pō, -shtä'-)   
n.
  1. The German internal security police as organized under the Nazi regime, known for its terrorist methods directed against those suspected of treason or questionable loyalty.
  2. gestapo pl. ge·sta·pos A police organization that employs terroristic methods to control a populace.
adj.
  1. Of, relating to, or characteristic of the German security police organized under the Nazi regime.
  2. gestapo Of, relating to, or characteristic of terroristic police methods or operations: gestapo tactics.









http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-executive-order-stokes-martial-law-fears.html
    Posted by BUCK SEXTON at 12:49 PM
    Labels:

    2 comments:

    1. AnonymousJanuary 13, 2010 at 2:06 PM

      the Nazi's won WWII. That pesky Hitler may have suffered 'regiem change' after he bit the wall street family hand's that financed him....

      you know.. senator prescott bush and averell harriman. ring a bell? the real nazi's are still in power...the still run the show, or what's left of the insanity...

      ReplyDelete
    2. BUCK SEXTONJanuary 13, 2010 at 2:31 PM

      Buzz, That's what I like about you, your a dynamic thinker. The big picture is as you say!


      By the way; on a past subject of statutory limits.
      You were right, The statute at the time was gender bias. In other words the teacher was NOT in violation of law.

      ReplyDelete

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)